SEX/VIOLENCE/HOLLYWOOD

 

Professor Jane Caputi, Women’s Studies,

Florida Atlantic University,

Boca Raton, FL  33431

 

It is critical that Peace Studies incorporate explorations of what popular culture tells about cultural understandings of the efficacy of violence, the gendered implications of peace and war, historical roots of violence, dehumanization and stereotyping.  Popular movies can be understood in many ways -- as representing the dream life of the nation, as political and moral influences, sometimes negative, sometimes positive, and as a repository of collective beliefs and values.  Through an interdisciplinary set of readings, and study of key films, we will consider the ways that violence and war, especially as these are involved with issues of race, class, sexuality, and gender roles, are variously presented in popular and genre films.  We also will be looking at films that either explicitly or implicitly offer theories regarding the roots of violence, the particular forms violence take in American culture due to histories of genocide of Native Americans, slavery, and modern forms of sexism and racism, the fusion of sexuality with violence, the affirmative association of masculinity and war.  Your readings will encompass a range of sources, from film criticism, spiritual writings, psychological studies, and political essays.  I expect you to be able to synthesize these various perspectives, and generate original ideas for the study of peace by examining and interpreting the role of violence in popular film.

 

Required Texts:

Sissela Bok, Mayhem: Violence as Public Entertainment (Reading, MA: Perseus Books, 1998).

James Gilligan, Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic (New York: Random House, 1996).

Linda Hogan, The Woman Who Watches Over the World, Norton, 2001

Bell Hooks, We Real Cool.  New York: Routledge, 2004

Jane Caputi, Goddesses and Monsters. U Wisconsin/Popular Press, 2004.

Christian de la Huerta, Coming Out Spiritually: The Next Step.  New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, 1999.

Martha McCaughey and Neal King, eds. Reel Knockouts.  Austin: University of Texas Press, 2001

 

There also will be shorter readings, articles and excerpts from other books, as indicated on the weekly schedule.

 

 

Requirements: All films must be viewed outside of class.

Take-home essay exams (40% each).  (sample questions included

Scrapbook Assignment (20%):  For this assignment, please gather 4 examples from the news or image media that in some way relate to the themes of this class (e.g., news items, print advertisements, clips from films or TV shows, song lyrics, fiction, a comic book).  For each item, provide at least one typewritten page, double-spaced text where you analyze this text or image, using theoretical and critical perspectives from the readings, class lectures, and discussions. Look for political, cultural, and symbolic meanings, recognizing that often these messages are multidimensional, complex and sometimes even paradoxical.  Make sure you choose entries that are manifestly distinct from one another and allow you to discuss different aspects of the class materials.

 

 

Weekly Schedule:

Week 1:  Introduction: Diverse perspectives on the role of popular cinema in expressing and influencing values, policies, and public perception.

          Denby, David. "Buried Alive." The New Yorker July 15 1996: 47-58.

Vivian Sobchak, “The Postmorbid Condition,” Signs of Life, ed. Jack Solomon and S. Maasik, 377-381

Brenda Patterson, “Healing Visual Violence,” New Age Journal, November/December 1996.

Robert Bork, “The Collapse of Popular Culture,” in Slouching toward Gomorrah, pp. 123-139.

Thich Nhat Hanh, “Ecology of Mind,” from Peace is Every Step, New York: Random House, 113-114.

Harold Schechter, The Bosom Serpent: Folklore and Popular Art, 2nd ed., Peter Lang, 2001, pp. ix-40.

 

 

                  

Week 2:  Popular violence as support for militarism

View: Gladiator (Ridley Scott, 1999)

Read:  The Production Code of the Motion Picture Producers and Directors of America, Inc. --1930-1934.

Bok, Mayhem

A.   O. Scott, “Vengeance Is Ours, Says Hollywood,” NY Times, May 2, 2004

 

 

Week 4:  Dehumanization and the creation of an enemy

Independence Day (Ronald Emmerich, 1997)

Grossman, Dave, On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society.  Back Bay Books, 1996 (excerpts)

Lerner, Gerda. Why History Matters: Life and Thought. New York: Oxford, 1997, pp. 3-17.

Maiese, Michelle, “What It Means to Dehumanize,” http://www.intractableconflict.org/m/dehumanization.jsp

Marshall, Lucinda. "The Connection between Militarism and Violence against Women." Rain and Thunder: A Radical Feminist Journal of Discussion and Activism Spring 2004: 5-7.

 

 

 

Week 5:  Violence in American origins and national myth

The Searchers (John Ford, 1956)

Readings:

Andrea Smith, Not an Indian Tradition: The Sexual Colonization of Native Peoples, Hypatia 18:2 (2003) 70-85.

 Linda Hogan, The Woman Who Watches Over the World, 2001

Arthur M. Eckstein, “Darkening Ethan: John Ford’s The Searchers (1956) from Novel to Screenplay to Screen,” Cinema Journal 38, no. 1, Fall 1998, pp. 3-24.

Kenneth Davis, “Ethnic Cleansing Didn’t Start in Bosnia,” New York Times, Sept. 3, 1996, sec. 4, p. 1

Baker, Nancy, V., et. al., “Family Killing Fields: Honor Rationales in the Murder of Women,” Violence Against Women, vol. 5, no. 2, Feb, 1999, 164-184.

 

 

Week 6:  The shared values supporting violence in a “family values” film and a serial-killer violence extravaganza.

View: Natural Born Killers (Oliver Stone, 1994) and Forrest Gump (Robert Zemeckis, 1996)  

Read: Jane Caputi, “Small Ceremonies” in Goddesses and Monsters, pp. 162-181

 

 

Week 7:  On violence, respect, and manhood

Scarface (Brian de Palma, 1983) and American Me (Edward James Olmos, 1992)   

View in Class: Def Jam Presents: Origin of a Hip-Hop Classic

Gilligan, On Violence

Robert Warshow, “The Gangster as Tragic Hero” The Immediate Experience, 1962, pp. 127-134.

Angela Davis, Masked Racism: Reflections on the Prison Industrial Complex,” http://home.ican.net/~edtoth/lawprisonrace.html

Don Sabo, et. al, “Gender and the Politics of Punishment,” in Prison Masculinities, ed. Sabo et. al., Philadelphia: Temple U. Press, 2001, pp. 1-18.

 

 

Week 8:  The connections between environmental and military violence and personal sexual violence. Violence growing out of unjust hierarchical power relations and abuse of power

Chinatown (Roman Polanski, 1974) and Desert Bloom (Eugene Corr, 1986), Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1963).

          Caputi, “Unthinkable Fathering,” Goddesses and Monsters, pp. 269-299.

Caputi, “Sex, Radiation and the Sacred,” Goddesses and Monsters, pp. 243-268.

 

 

Week 9:  The continuing legacy of violence wrought by slavery

Antwone Fisher (Denzel Washington, 2003)

Read: Hooks, We Real Cool

 

Week 10:  Violence and the stereotypic feminine “other”

View:  A Fool There Was,  Basic Instinct (Paul Verhoeven, 1992)

Read: Halberstam, Judith, “Imagined Violence,” Reel Knockouts, 244-265.

Bram Dijkstra, Evil Sisters: The threat of female sexuality and the cult of manhood.  New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996, pp. 3-47

 

Week 11:  Two films on resistance and female violence.

View:  Set It Off  (F. Gary Gray, 1996) Thelma and Louise (Ridley Scott, 1991)

Read: Patricia Williams. “Teleology on the Rocks,” The Alchemy of Race and Rights: Diary of a Law Professor.  Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991, 55-79. 

          Leslie Marmon Silko, “In the Combat Zone,” Hungry Mind, Fall 1995, pp. 44-45.

Kimberly Springer, “Waiting to Set it Off,” Reel Knockouts, 172-199

 

 

Week 12: A Pornography of Violence?

Kill Bill 1 and 2 (Quentin Tarantino, 2003, 2004)

Thich Nhat Hanh, Peace is Every Step, Random House, 1991.

Reel Knockouts, Intro, pp. 1-24

 

 

Week 13:  The serial killer as emblem of American consumerism and empire

The Silence of the Lambs (Jonathan Demme, 1992)

Morrow, Lance. A Moment for the Dead. Time, April 1, 1991: 82.

Caputi, “American Psychos, Goddesses and Monsters, 141-161.

 

 

Week 14:  Gender and the War Film

Full Metal Jacket (Stanley Kubrick, 1986) and G.I. Jane (Ridley Scott, 1997)

Read: Paul Krugman, “The Rambo Coalition,” NY Times, August 24, 2004

William Broyles Jr., “Why Men Love War”, Esquire, November 1984, pp. 55-65.

Carol Tavris, “Beautiful Souls and Different Voices: Why Women are Not Superior to Men,” The Mismeasure of Women.  New York: Simon and Schuster, 1992, pp. 57-92.

Burke, Carol. "From New Recruit to Soldier: Military Discipline Is Enforced with Marching Chants--and Their Sexist, Racist, Brutal Messages." Women's Review of Books 21.12 (2004): 6-7.

Swofford, Anthony. Jarhead: A Marine's Chronicle of the Gulf War and Other Battles. New York: Scribner, 2003, excerpts

 

Week 15:  Sexuality, gender and violence in the military. Homophobia and the roots of violence

View: Soldier Girl (Frank Pierson, 2004)

Read: de la Huerta, Coming Out Spiritually

 

         

Sample Take-Home Exam Questions:

1.     Writing in the Village Voice Manhola Dargis observes, “The hostile fixation on Thelma and Louise betrays a deep unease with the idea of female violence.  As a rule, violence is a male prerogative, an entitlement that brings with it control, domination, and finally power.”  Many of your readings speak to the ways that violence is “gendered.”  In other words, women and men are socially positioned differently in relation to violence.  Talk about their ideas on this and examine the gendering of violence as it plays out in two or three films we have viewed this semester.

2.     In “Teleology on the Rocks,” Patricia Williams writes that a form of “psychic violence” is an “obliteration of the self through domination by an all-powerful other. . . .What links child abuse, the mistreatment of women, and racism is the massive external intrusion into psyche that dominating powers impose to keep the self from ever fully seeing itself.”  First of all discuss and elaborate on Williams’ ideas.  Next, consider these in relation to the characters of Clarice in Silence of the Lambs, Thelma in T&L, and Frankie in Set It Off.  Do dominant others commit psychic violence against these women?  How does each of these characters respond?  Do they reclaim self-definition and if so how?  Or do they succumb to these negative images and, if so, how?  Do these characters end up fully seeing the self?

3.     One of the recurrent questions in your readings is the effect of violence and violent representations on attributes traditionally related to the soul. Drawing upon the writings of Saint Augustine, Bok asks us to consider whether we experience  soul stabbing” and/or “soul enlargement” from violent popular entertainments.  Gilligan speaks of soul death due to the trauma of actual violence.  Williams speaks of “spirit murder.”  First of all, provide some elaboration on and evaluation of these ideas.  Choosing at least two of the films we have seen this semester, speak to the elaboration through character and plot of ideas regarding the soul in relation to violence.  Consider as well your own response to the films.  Can they be said to cause either soul growth or atrophy?

4.     James Gilligan summarizes the argument of his book Violence: “The fundamental challenge for our time. . . is to break the link between civilization and patriarchy . . . . If humanity is to evolve beyond the propensity toward violence that now threatens our very survival as a species, then it can only do so by recognizing the extent to which the patriarchal code of honor and shame generates and obligates male violence. If we wish to bring this violence under control, we need to begin by reconstituting what we mean by both masculinity and femininity.”  First of all, elaborate on and explain what he means by this. How does the code of honor and shame work to produce male violence?  How do traditional gender roles contribute to violence in his view?  Consider Gilligan’s ideas to the themes in Antwone Fisher, Scarface, American Me, and Set if Off.

5.     A new video game, “Unreal Tournament,” has the science-fictional premise that in the future Earth’s leaders begin sanctioning bloody public exhibitions among brutal deep-space miners to vent their violent tendencies. Soon, these contests evolve into a multi-billion-dollar professional league.  Game players are exhorted to “crush your enemies.” Pretend that you are an historian and social critic from the year 3000.  Although many historians now condemn them as horrifically cruel, the Roman gladiatorial games were considered normal entertainment in their time.  In the year 2000, sex and violence are key ingredients of popular movies as well as other pop-culture products.  Write an essay reflecting on the relation of late 20th century American movies with the Roman gladiatorial games, referring specifically and in some detail to at least two of the films we have viewed in class, as well as with the culture of the year 3000 (it is up to you to decide how to envision that future and tell us what forces formed it).

 

 

 

Additional Bibliography:

 

Alloway, L. (1971). Violent America: The Movies, 1946-1964. Greenwich, CT, New York Graphic Society.

Atkins, T. ed. (1976).  Graphic Violence on the Screen.  New York: Monarch.

Bataille, G. (1962). Death and Sensuality: A Study of Eroticism and the Taboo. New York, Walker and Company.

Broday, S. (1977). Screen Violence and Film Censorship: A Review of Research. London, H.M.S.O.

Clover, C. J. (1992). Men, Women and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. Princeton, NJ, Princeton U Press. 

Doane, M. A. (1981). Femmes Fatales: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. New York, Routledge.

Duclos, D. (1998). The Werewolf Complex: America's Fascination with Violence. New York, Oxford.

Gilligan, J. (1996). Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic. New York, Vintage Books.

Hart, L. (1994). Fatal Women: Lesbian Sexuality and the Mark of Aggression. Princeton, NJ, Princeton U Press.

Hill, A. (1997). Shocking Entertainment: Viewer Response to Violent Movies. Luton, Bedfordshire, UK, University of Luton Press.

Hooks, B. (1992). Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston, South End Press.

Hooks, B. (1996). Reel to Real: Race, Sex and Class at the Movies. New York, Routledge.

Horsley, J. (1999). The Blood Poets: A Cinema of Savagery, 1958-1999. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.

Jeffords, S. (1994). Hard Bodies: Hollywood Masculinity in the Reagan Era. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers U Press.   

Kagan, N. (1995). The Cinema of Oliver Stone. New York, Continuum.

Kittelson, M. L., Ed. (1998). The Soul of Popular Culture. Peru, Il, Carus Publishing.

Lovell, J. P., Ed. (1998). Insights from Film into Violence and Oppression: Shattered Dreams of the Good Life. Westport, CT, Praeger Press.

Paul, W. (1994). Laughing, Screaming: Modern Hollywood Horror and Comedy. New York, Columbia UP.    

Prince, S., Ed. (2000). Screening Violence. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers U Press.

Slotkin, R. (1973). Regeneration through Violence. Middletown, Ct, Wesleyan UP.

Solanas, V. (1995). The Scum Manifesto. I Shot Andy Warhol. M. Harron and D. Minahan. New York, Grove Press.

Wood, R. (1986). Hollywood from Vietnam to Reagan. New York, Columbia U Press.